That's commonly done when substituting chords. If it is, as you seem to believe, a substitute chord (probably Em replacing C major) then you could simply just write "Em" without mentioning the C chord at all. But I'm pretty sure that the notation C/Em does not imply a polychord with a C triad on top of an Em triad, simply because these two chords share two of their three notes, so such a polychord hardly makes any sense. However, this is usually indicated by a horizontal line separating the two chord symbols. What does exist are polychords where two different chords are stacked on top of each other. C/E, which means that you're supposed to play a C major triad with the note E in the bass. What Lilypond can do - as you know - is add a letter after a slash, e.g. The problem is that this is not a common notation, and the meaning of the symbol "C/Em" is unclear. Is there a more proper notation for such a situation? Rather than having different scores they'd just been notating this in pencil with a sash and the other possible chord for that location. Is there a proper way to notate this?Įdit: As best I can make out at this time the musician expected the guitar player to normally play one chord but that a piano player playing the same thing might optionally use a different chord. Warning: Spurious garbage following chord: (chord-colon #)Ĭlearly it isn't happy with this notation, but even having reviewed the manual on Chord notation I don't see a reason this wouldn't work. There is an warning thrown to the console that says: Parsing. What is wrong here (with either my Lilypond code or the music notation)? For some reason I can't get the output I expected. I'm engraving some music using Lilypond and have been requested to engrave an alternate chord name next to a chord.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |